Editorial: Compete with peers, avoid comparison

Editorial: Compete with peers, avoid comparison

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Self motivation limits individual’s capabilities

Athletes grapple on the court for a position on the starting roster. They serve, return and rally with one another in anticipation to gain the starting spot. Competition between teammates drives student athletes to become better than each other, ultimately making the team stronger.

Kaylie Clem | The Feather Online

Campus tennis players compete for high positions on the team ladder. Mark Pimentel, ’21, (pictured) returns a serve during a tennis match in spring.

Critics of peer to peer competition argue that one can attain greater success by focusing on competing with an individual’s own accomplishments. However, as many struggle to self motivate themselves.

Competition with peers raises expectations and propels students to new heights of excellence. Self motivation offers a short term solution to a long term problem. As soon as the self motivation dissipates, so does progress and product. Competition between peers is a constant source of motivation that encourages progression.

An example of this idea is the way tennis teams function. Members compete against each other to gain a higher spot on the ladder three times a season to rank themselves and see who will play.

Then the team as a whole comes together and competes against other teams, who also compete internally before facing outside competition.

Competition allows teams to grow stronger as individuals and as a group, as the team which performs the best as a whole wins. According to “True Competition,” by David Shields and Brenda Bredemeier, teammates who work together towards excellence build each other up.

However, when competition becomes comparison, individuals stagnate in their pursuit for something greater. Comparing oneself to other people promotes a sense of pride. The pride of being better than another shifts the focus away from growth and causes inactivity in achievement.

Teammates who compare themselves with each other breed feelings of prejudice which divides the team. Teams with healthy levels of competition practice with purpose. That practice translates to success during games.

Competition remains a necessary element to the progression of human achievement. Avoid comparison with your peers, but inspire competition among colleagues to propel creations and talents to new heights.

For more editorials, read EDITORIAL: Refrain from gossip. For more articles, read Superintendent Jeremy Brown strives to advance FC campus.

Follow The Feather via Twitter @thefeather, Instagram @thefeatheronline and Facebook @thefeatheronline.

Your voice is important to us. Share your opinion in the comment box located beneath the Related Posts section.
By |2019-02-08T11:50:26+00:00December 14th, 2018|Editorial, Opinions|1 Comment

About the Author:

Feather Staff
The Feather Online staff changes anew with the start of the school year. While articles are edited by the editors-in-chief(s), they may be written by any other staff members or (most likely) been written in collaboration. All articles are attributed to Fresno Christian High School students unless they are expressly attributed otherwise.

One Comment

  1. Avatar
    Shauna January 11, 2019 at 3:03 pm - Reply

    Great job! The difference between healthy competition and comparison is important to remember. Good topic to cover. I enjoyed the article.

Leave A Comment

Fresno Christian Schools - 7280 N. Cedar Ave., Fresno, CA 93720 - 559.229.1695 Facebook Soundcloud Twitter Vimeo Instagram Email SmugMug March 21, 2019 - 09:49 am